Monkey Albino

Linux altar53.supremepanel53.com 4.18.0-553.8.1.lve.el8.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jul 4 16:24:39 UTC 2024 x86_64
/ home/ bdapparelinfo/ mail/ new/

/home/bdapparelinfo/mail/new/1721017838.M626129P17615.altar56.supremepanel56.com,S=6475,W=6580

Return-Path: <>
Delivered-To: bdapparelinfo@altar56.supremepanel56.com
Received: from altar56.supremepanel56.com
	by altar56.supremepanel56.com with LMTP
	id MOGNJO6llGbPRAAAkKCAWQ
	(envelope-from <>)
	for <bdapparelinfo@altar56.supremepanel56.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2024 04:30:38 +0000
Return-path: <>
Envelope-to: bdapparelinfo@altar56.supremepanel56.com
Delivery-date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 04:30:38 +0000
Received: from mailnull by altar56.supremepanel56.com with local (Exim 4.96.2)
	id 1sTDME-0007Sp-1j
	for bdapparelinfo@altar56.supremepanel56.com;
	Mon, 15 Jul 2024 04:30:38 +0000
X-Failed-Recipients: kader.trimsmaker2013@yahoo.com,
  md.wasim0@gmail.com
Auto-Submitted: auto-replied
From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@altar56.supremepanel56.com>
To: bdapparelinfo@altar56.supremepanel56.com
References: <E1sTDMD-0007Sa-2c@altar56.supremepanel56.com>
Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary=1721017838-eximdsn-1074126583
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Message-Id: <E1sTDME-0007Sp-1j@altar56.supremepanel56.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 04:30:38 +0000

--1721017838-eximdsn-1074126583
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

  kader.trimsmaker2013@yahoo.com
    host mta6.am0.yahoodns.net [67.195.204.77]
    SMTP error from remote mail server after end of data:
    554 5.7.9 Message not accepted for policy reasons. See https://senders.yahooinc.com/error-codes
  md.wasim0@gmail.com
    host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com [142.250.123.26]
    SMTP error from remote mail server after end of data:
    550-5.7.26 Unauthenticated email from mail.ru is not accepted due to domain's
    550-5.7.26 DMARC policy. Please contact the administrator of mail.ru domain if
    550-5.7.26 this was a legitimate mail. To learn about the DMARC initiative, go
    550-5.7.26 to
    550 5.7.26  https://support.google.com/mail/?p=DmarcRejection af79cd13be357-7a160c8f0b9si428752285a.754 - gsmtp

--1721017838-eximdsn-1074126583
Content-type: message/delivery-status

Reporting-MTA: dns; altar56.supremepanel56.com

Action: failed
Final-Recipient: rfc822;md.wasim0@gmail.com
Status: 5.0.0
Remote-MTA: dns; gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550-5.7.26 Unauthenticated email from mail.ru is not accepted due to domain's
 550-5.7.26 DMARC policy. Please contact the administrator of mail.ru domain if
 550-5.7.26 this was a legitimate mail. To learn about the DMARC initiative, go
 550-5.7.26 to
 550 5.7.26  https://support.google.com/mail/?p=DmarcRejection af79cd13be357-7a160c8f0b9si428752285a.754 - gsmtp

Action: failed
Final-Recipient: rfc822;kader.trimsmaker2013@yahoo.com
Status: 5.0.0
Remote-MTA: dns; mta6.am0.yahoodns.net
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 554 5.7.9 Message not accepted for policy reasons. See https://senders.yahooinc.com/error-codes

--1721017838-eximdsn-1074126583
Content-type: message/rfc822

Return-path: <bdapparelinfo@altar56.supremepanel56.com>
Received: from bdapparelinfo by altar56.supremepanel56.com with local (Exim 4.96.2)
	(envelope-from <bdapparelinfo@altar56.supremepanel56.com>)
	id 1sTDMD-0007Sa-2c;
	Mon, 15 Jul 2024 04:30:37 +0000
To: kader.trimsmaker2013@yahoo.com, md.wasim0@gmail.com
Subject: Mail From Our Website :кракен 14
X-PHP-Script: powmax.net/contact.php for 146.70.111.145
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 2513:contact.php
From: oncommi1985@mail.ru
Reply-To: oncommi1985@mail.ru
Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Message-Id: <E1sTDMD-0007Sa-2c@altar56.supremepanel56.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 04:30:37 +0000

<div style='line-height:30px; color:#C00; border:1px solid #CCC;padding:10px;'><strong>Name :</strong> JulianKix<br><strong>Email:</strong> oncommi1985@mail.ru<br><strong>Subject:</strong> кракен 14<br><strong>Message:</strong> The media is in meltdown over Caitlin Clark <br />
<a href=https://kraken-18at.net>kraken2</a> <br />
The male-dominated sports media apparatus is stumbling over Caitlin Clark. <br />
 <br />
It is trying to pretend that it hasn’t ignored the WNBA for decades until the superstar rookie came along. But rather than admitting its blind spots, several male commentators are parachuting themselves into a league they barely understand and dismissing anyone who suggests they could do better. <br />
https://kraken-23at.net <br />
kraken onion <br />
In the flurry of hot takes that followed Chennedy Carter’s foul against Clark over the weekend, ESPN host Pat McAfee went on his show Monday to argue that Clark — whom he casually called the “White b*tch for the Indiana team” — was singularly responsible for the sudden surge of WNBA popularity and therefore she should be given more respect. He later apologized for using the slur, emphasizing that his broader thesis was that Clark’s star power created a halo around a league that’s been languishing in obscurity. <br />
 <br />
“I was talking about how I hoped that the WNBA and sports media, ex-WNBA players, would show a little bit more respect to Caitlin Clark for what she has brought to the WNBA,” McAfee said on his show Tuesday. <br />
 <br />
Of course, it’s not that the league was dormant before Clark got there, it’s that most of the mainstream press weren’t paying attention. The impact of Clark’s arrival is undeniable. But McAfee and the four men flanking him in his Indiana studio are not the best people to lead that conversation on one of the most influential sports networks in America. <br />
https://kraken-19at.net <br />
kraken16 <br />
McAfee’s right that the ground is shifting for women’s basketball — it’s one of those pivotal moments when journalists and analysts would normally call up an expert or two and try to absorb some of the complexities of the situation. Instead, the male commentariat have done too much talking and not enough listening. <br />
 <br />
Clark, a White, straight phenom, has become male sportscasters’ proxy in a league built primarily by Black and LGBTQ athletes whom the mainstream felt fine skimming over in the past. And in covering the league, they’re relying on outdated tropes about how women are supposed to behave. Charles Barkley recently called women “petty” for being rough on Clark.<br>

--1721017838-eximdsn-1074126583--